.@Sen_JoeManchin for POTUS …

… or at least, for the Democratic nomination.

A serious, centrist Democrat should be able to make a play for the blue collar Dems who put Donald Trump in office.

Repudiation of the Green New Deal would not only differentiate his candidacy from the clown show of announced candidates, it would stake his claim as the only adult in the room.

Even if it is a position that is not currently popular with the Dem electorate, 15-20% sees through the B.S. In a field of 20 to 30, 15-20% could be a frontrunner.

Then there’s the issue of energy state Dems who will have no one else to vote for if the entire party embraces the Green New Deal.

A Manchin candidacy would at least give a voter like me a Democratic alternative. I do not consider the Green New Deal to be serious policy proposal. I will not consider any candidate who embraces it.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Old-School King of the NFL, Part II

(A followup to this post, after having a few days to ruminate on it.)

According to these guys, half of all NFL games are decided by 8 points or fewer.

That means at least half of all games are potentially in the hands of one referee and whether or not he/she decides to drop a flag on a single late-fourth quarter pass play.

The current pass interference penalty (first down at the spot of the foul, spot the ball on the one yard line in the case of an end zone foul) encourages offenses simply to chuck the ball deep and hope for a flag.

Remedy? Simply adopt the NCAA rule: The penalty for pass interference is 15 yards and a first down. Revert to the current penalty only in the case a blatant foul. (FWIW, the Robey-Coleman non-call in the NFC Championship game was what I would call a blatant foul: blow to the receiver’s head, back to the ball, no attempt to make a play on the ball.)

Sure, that leaves some judgment on the zebras. But it makes offenses a lot less likely to “chuck it downfield” and cross their fingers.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

They’ve taken a game of inches and turned it into a game of millimeters.

I love football, but I’m old school. If it were up to me, games would still end in ties (after four quarters), quarterbacks would be treated as if they were football players, and there would be no instant replay.

The game of football is strangled by excessive commercial timeouts and incessant instant replay reviews. Routine first down calls are now reviewed to see if the receiver’s pinky touched the turf before the ball, or if he made a “football move”, whatever that is, prior to being separated from the pigskin.

I’ve always assumed the refs call the game as straight as possible, and the blown calls even out. (But then, I’m not a bettor.)

Instant replay is a fact of life. The NFL’s new rules have choked the life out of the regular season game: the only suspense is whether pass interference penalties will outnumber roughing-the-QB flags. We find ourselves in the second quarter of game 3 reviewing ball placement with a micrometer: Is it third-and-2, or third-and-a-yard-and-a-half?

But then a monumentally consequential non-call (of both pass interference and the new-age indiscretion of “helmet-to-helmet contact”) inside the 10-yard line with mere seconds on the clock, in a conference championship game, no less, calls into question the integrity of the whole league. The refs have always tended to “let ‘em play” in playoff games, and I don’t have a problem with that. But a playoff game should at least resemble the regular season games.

And a big-market team should not get favorable calls in a big game just because they need to put butts in the skyboxes to pay for their new gazillion-dollar stadium.

But I digress.

If I were king, I would decree the following changes to instant replay and play review. Forthwith, as we royals say.

  • Allow coaches’ challenges per current rules, to include pass interference and non-calls.
  • Any instant replay review must be complete within 40 seconds. Beyond that, the call on the field stands.
  • Most importantly, all replay reviews must be conducted with video at full speed, not slow-motion.

Slow-motion often makes the call more ambiguous, not less.

With video review at full speed, that NFC Championship non-call is reversed 100 times out of 100. No question about it.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Fact-Checking @WashingtonPost’s Outrageous and Unsubstantiated Claim: ‘Taylor Energy’s Oil Spill Rivals BP’


Photo caption: An aerial image of an oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico, taken on April 28, 2018. (Oscar Garcia-Pineda)

WaPo Headline: A 14-year-long oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico verges on becoming one of the worst in U.S. history

The more I read this article, the more errors I find.

Author Darrel Fears depended heavily on Oscar Garcia-Pineda, described as a ‘geoscience consultant’, for estimates of spill volume. Garcia-Pineda’s estimate of the spill’s ongoing rate is 300 to 700 barrels per day for 14 years; at the upper end, that’s 3.6 million barrels, which, if true, would be on the order of magnitude of the BP spill (est. 5 million barrels +/-).

Problem is, Garcia’s own photo (above) documents a silvery to rainbow sheen.

Fears says, “…all that is left of the doomed Taylor platform are rainbow-colored oil slicks that are often visible for miles.”

I took annual Oil Spill Response Training for 10 years. This is a federal requirement of all personnel whose jobs might put them in charge of oil spill response. I learned in that training (in fact, I learned it 10 times) that oil spill volumes are estimated on visual observation. I offer more details here; suffice to say that Fears’ observation and Garcia’s photo lend credibility to the Coast Guard’s official estimate of from 1 to 55 barrels per day. Over 14 years, it has probably averaged on the low end of that range.

300 to 700 barrels per day is simply not credible. You would necessarily see heavy, oil-colored slicks, not silvery or rainbow sheens.

Here are some other pictures from “Field experiment at Taylor Energy oil leak offshore Mississippi Delta” which Fears linked NOAA’s website, apparently with Garcia’s contribution. Quoting:

This oil leak followed the destruction of a Taylor Energy oilrig by Hurricane Ivan in 2004, and since then small quantities of oil has kept spreading at the surface of the Gulf. (Verbatim, emphasis added.)


So when did “small quantities of oil” as documented in all these pictures become 300 to 700 barrels per day, a major spill by any estimation?

Did Garcia mean 300 to 700 gallons per day? That would be roughly 7 to 17 barrels per day, consistent with the USCG estimate, and more in line with the visual evidence. Certainly not stop-the-presses headline worthy.

“There is abundant evidence that supports the fact that these reports from [USCG National Response Center] are incorrect,” Garcia-Pineda wrote. Later he said: “My conclusion is that NRC reports are not reliable.”

My conclusion is that Mr. Garcia-Pineda needs to check his data and his cipherin’. Also: Never trust a journalist with a calculator.

Mr. Fears continues to wing it:

About 2,000 platforms stand in the waters off the Bayou State. Nearly 2,000 others are off the coasts of its neighbors, Texas and Mississippi.

Wrong. There are fewer than 2,400 structures in federal waters. I suspect 2,000 of them are off Louisiana; many of those are single-well structures in shallow water. So that leaves more like 400 off TX and MS (and AL).

For every 1,000 wells in state and federal waters, there’s an average of 20 uncontrolled releases of oil — or blowouts — every year.

An uncontrolled release and a blowout are not the same thing. A pipeline leak could be an uncontrolled release. The link is for BSEE’s annual incident reports which do not document uncontrolled releases, so I have no idea where this number came from. Blowouts are rare events.

A fire erupts offshore every three days, on average, and hundreds of workers are injured annually.

According to the incident reporting link above, there were 73 fires in 2017. That’s one every 5.0 days, to be exact. Sixty-seven of them were classified ‘incidental’. Five were ‘minor’ and one was ‘major’ (damage > $1,000,000). There was one injury associated with fire.

There was also one explosion.

In 2017, there were 150 total injuries of all types (not ‘hundreds’); 39 involved no lost time and no restricted duties. These could be ‘first-aid’ incidents: slip-and-fall, cuts, heat exhaustion, etc. Forty-one of the incidents involved lost time in excess of 3 days. There were no fatalities.

According to Fears, when Hurricane Ivan hit Taylor’s ill-fated platform…

More than 620 barrels of crude oil stacked on its deck came tumbling down with it.

Ummm, they don’t use physical barrels.

The spill was hidden for six years before environmental watchdog groups stumbled on oil slicks while monitoring the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster a few miles north of the Taylor site in 2010.

Taylor’s platform was in a mudslide area just beyond the mouth of the Mississippi River. BP’s Macondo well site was in deep water, well to the south.

It may sound like I’m picking nits here, but the whole point of the article is to serve as a ‘cautionary tale’ for the states on the East Coast that would consider drilling in the Atlantic Region.

Misrepresenting the volume and the risk matters.

  • Taylor’s catastrophic platform failure is lamentable, but it is a hazard that goes along with building structures in the unstable soils of the Mississippi mudslide area. It is not typical of offshore operations.
  • The volume estimate of 300 to 700 bpd is either a mistake or a deliberate misrepresentation. There are natural seeps in the Gulf that probably exceed Taylor’s true volume.
  • Working in the offshore is not without risk. The environment involves combustible materials at extreme temperatures and pressures. Controlling it requires lots of heavy equipment. Accidents do happen, but the safety record of industry compares favorable with all other industries.



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I’ve found my Muse.


My liberal-artsy friends may have learned that it rhymes with “hickory”, but in New Orleans it’s pronounced “TURP-si-kor”.

Terpsichore is one of a series of streets in the Lower Garden District named for the Greek Muses. Terpsichore is the muse of dance.

[Several other Muse streets have, um, flexible pronunciations. “Calliope” is KALLY-ope. “Clio” is C-L-ten (that’s a joke). “Melpomene” was MEL-po-meen. Now it’s pronounced “M-L-King”, at least in the stretch where it crosses St. Charles Avenue.]

If you’ve seen me dance at a wedding or a party, you’ll have no trouble believing that I once dreamed of a career as a dancer. In Junior High I studied ballroom dance. Skilly, my teacher, advised me that my size 7-1/2 EEE feet and my lead a$$ were better suited for a career behind a desk.

But in a new video, New Orleanian Mike Marina gives me hope. Mike Marina is my Muse, my Terpsichore.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Everything I need to know about polls I learned in Junior High

It’s funny how some episodes from your past stick in your memory, while more significant ones don’t.

In ninth grade, all students were asked to complete a written survey on the topic of alcohol and drugs. We were told that the survey was being conducted by a grad student at the local university.

Among my friends, this seemed like the perfect spoof. I don’t remember if I’d even tasted beer at the time, but according to my survey answers I was a frequent drinker who blacked out regularly. Drug use? Sure, why not: LSD, cocaine, pills. Heroin too, but no more frequently than once a month.

The induced paranoia of another crowd convinced them that “narcs” were really behind the survey. Answer honestly? Riiiight.

I’m sure the survey made a beautiful grad school paper, complete with line charts, bar graphs and R-squared factors.

But the data it was based on wasn’t worth ca-ca.

LESSON: People lie, especially to pollsters, for a host of reasons.

Political polls have been notoriously bad of late. Out of every 100 people who answer a poll, maybe a handful consciously lie out of fear of judgment, paranoia, or distrust of the polling organization. Enough to make the results unreliable.

Most polls are reported with a precise-sounding “margin of error”. The margin of error is a statistical device to account for the small size of the sample relative to the population whose attitudes it is supposed to represent.

So if a poll has a margin of error of 3.8%, but one in twenty people lie, what do you have? A poll that is very likely wrong.

Distrustful people may also avoid taking the poll altogether. The poll naturally skews to the opinions of people who trust the pollster.

People who self-report as “likely voters” may not all have the same motivation to vote come election day.

Some may argue that all these error factors should cancel each other out, and they’re right, the should. But these days, journalists are not unbiased observers. CNN, to name just one, has a stake in the outcome.

What is the value of a poll that has lost its predictive power? Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.  News filler. Merely something to talk about until real news comes along.

Polls aren’t news. Polls aren’t news. Polls aren’t news.





Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Legend of the Dyspeptic Date

“That’s her. She’s the one.” Scott pointed to a picture of a girl named Rhonda in the freshman facebook.

Before there was Facebook, every college had a freshman facebook.

It was the last day of orientation, 1974.

Scott was a scholarship jock.  He was on the periphery of what would become our core 4th floor freshman social group in our all-male dorm. The night before, we’d all attended the campus-wide freshman week party, featuring lots of cheap champagne and endless kegs of Lone Star.

And lots of drunk kids meeting each other for the first time.

Scott continued: “So me and Rhonda are sitting on a bench … that’s her name, right? My hands are roaming, you know what I mean? And Rhonda’s relaxed, not saying nothing.

“So this goes on a while, then Rhonda leans over and puts her head in my lap!”

Us (anticipating Flounder): “This is gonna be great!”

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Thoughts on the Electoral College, Part I: Voter Eligibility

The Constitution of the United States specifies that the President be selected by electors, not by popular vote.

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress… (Article II, Section 1).

So there is no national uniformity in voter qualification, or in voting methods. Oregon has gone to 100% vote-by-mail. In North Dakota, there is no system of voter registration; voters go to the polls on Election Day, present ID, and vote.

The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature. (Article I, Section 2).

This section specifies eligibility to vote in Congressional elections. Again, determination of eligibility is the responsibility of the states, not the Federal government.

Just for grins, let’s say we adopt a pure popular-vote system for electing the President.

Two things happen immediately:

  • The power to name the President devolves to the states with the highest urban concentrations of voters. Smaller and less-densely populated states lose their voice.
  • States could gain power by subverting Federal immigration law and lowering voter qualification standards. (Not that that would ever happen! </sarc>)

In such a system, a vote becomes a commodity, a currency of power, not a transaction between candidate and voter.

Only the biggest mass communication centers get any attention from candidates.

Power is determined by how efficiently and effectively voters can be motivated to vote and corralled to the polls.

How much attention will the 270,000 registered voters in Wyoming receive? Their vote becomes insignificant.

One flaw in our current system is the attention paid to small-state interests when during presidential primary season. The Renewable Fuels Standard, which mandates the use of corn ethanol, is one manifestations this. I hate the RFS, but use it as an example to demonstrate that under an national popular election, only urban and big-state interests (read: CA, TX, NY, IL, FL) will be served.

The Constitution is a contract, voluntarily entered into by states of varying sizes with varying interests. One of the key compromises was the formation of the Senate, in which each state has an equal voice. Absent that compromise, small states had no incentive to ratify. Thirty-seven states have joined and the population has shifted, but the need for balance and equity among the states is the same as it was in 1789.


Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Dear Democrats: If my choice is between Elizabeth Warren and a cur dog for President in 2020, the cur dog gets my vote. This is why.

Elizabeth Warren has a plan to save capitalism, by Matthew Yglesias, Vox.com

Warren wants to create an Office of United States Corporations inside the Department of Commerce and require any corporation with revenue over $1 billion — only a few thousand companies, but a large share of overall employment and economic activity — to obtain a federal charter of corporate citizenship.

The charter tells company directors to consider the interests of all relevant stakeholders — shareholders, but also customers, employees, and the communities in which the company operates — when making decisions.  …

More concretely, United States Corporations would be required to allow their workers to elect 40 percent of the membership of their board of directors.

Emphasis added.

  1. “You had me at ‘Matthew Yglesias.’” Fair enough.
  2. ”We must kill capitalism in order to save it,” he said, without a hint of irony.
  3. A new, massive federal bureaucracy to regulate the public behavior of “only a few thousand companies” (= 80% of GDP). Central planning, here we come.
  4. Who will run the OUSC, and who decides what is in the public interest? Would that person be (unconstitutionally) beyond the reach of the White House, the way Sen. Warren designed the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau?
  5. ”ExxonMobil, we’d like to see you allocating 60% of your capital investment to algae research and solar panels. It’s for the children, mmm-kay?”
  6. ”Koch Industries, you’re in time out, mmm-kay?”
  7. Because labor bosses have historically been tireless fiduciaries for the interests of their workers.
  8. One road to economic equality is called “Dow 5,000”. Liz’s proposal will take us there.

Here we are, scarcely 25 years removed from the fall of the Soviet Union, and we have American politicians openly espousing government control of private corporations.

SMDH, as the young folks say.

I have long sensed that our freedoms are most vulnerable to attack from the collectivist Left, not the Right. Indeed, many apolitical corporatists may go along with such a proposal out of perceived self-interest and a promised coziness with government.

Survival of our freedoms as we know them, should such a policy be pursued? If the over/under is 15 years, I’ll take “under”.

That’s how big a threat I perceive from Liz Warren.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Thoughts on the Monarchy and Pro Wrestling

On a recent trip across the pond, we shared conversation with a couple from the U.K. Fine folks, actually.

We had toured sites of Christian history dating to the Middle Ages. The conversation turned to today’s low rate of church attendance among Europeans compared to Americans.

The gentleman, a retired software engineer, offered as explanation that, to paraphrase, they’re beyond all that.

Then he asked with more than a little disdain, “We hear that in the States you have a substantial faction that supports teaching Biblical Creation in schools; is that true?”

That’s true, I said, adding that while I don’t agree with teaching Biblical Creation in school, in my mind scientific observation cannot disprove a metaphysical answer to the question, “Why are we here?”

The conversation pretty much ended there.

Since returning Stateside, we’ve endured a barrage of media coverage of the impending nuptials between a pretty American actress, Meghan Markle, and a red-headed fellow named Harry Mountbatten-Windsor. Ms. Markle is the one they invariably call a “commoner”.

The institutions of the monarchy and the peerage assume that it is possible for a person to be worthy of privilege and a higher station by virtue of birth.

At least my Bible-quoting countrymen don’t believe any of that bunk

I’m reminded of the Don King era, when boxing aficionados felt a similar disdain for fans of Professional Wrestling, because Pro Wrestling was so obviously fixed.

Boxing was beyond all that, old chap.


Posted in Popular Culture | Leave a comment